Salesforce SHARING-AND-VISIBILITY-DESIGNER Online Practice Questions and Exam Preparation

Salesforce SHARING-AND-VISIBILITY-DESIGNER Online Questions & Answers

• Question 131:

  What advanced tool can Salesforce enable for large-scale role hierarchy realignment?

  A. Granular locking
  B. Partitioning Division
  C. Set external organizational-wide default to public read only
  D. Skinny Table Indexing
  A. Granular locking

• Question 132:

  The architect has a requirement to create a criteria-based sharing rule based on the customer Social.. up the rule in Contact Sharing, the field is not shown on the list of available field. What might cause this?

  A. The field has been configured for encryption.
  B. The architect does not have permission to Compliance fields.
  C. The architect's profile does not have field level Security (FLS) for this field.
  D. fields with validation rules are not available for sharing rules.
  A. The field has been configured for encryption.

• Question 133:

  At Universal Containers, Accounts and Contacts are normally visible to all employees, and Proposals (custom object) are visible to the Account owner and managers. However, some Proposals are considered confidential and are managed by a Strategic Proposals team. These Proposals should not be visible to anyone in the Sales group other than the owner and the strategic team. How should the architect design for this requirement?

  A. Proposal Owner set to the Strategic Deals Team Queue and set the Account relationship to Master-Detail.
  B. Disable Grant Access Using Hierarchies and set an Owner-Based Sharing rule for Strategic Deals team.
  C. Proposal Owner set to the Strategic Deals Team Queue and create an owner-based sharing rule to grant visibility to the Account owner
  D. Disable Grant Access Using Hierarchies and set a Criteria-Based Sharing rule for Strategic Deals team.
  D. Disable Grant Access Using Hierarchies and set a Criteria-Based Sharing rule for Strategic Deals team.

• Question 134:

  Universal Container (UC) is in a legal dispute regarding several orders. UC has found out these records VP of Sales has asked to ensure this cannot happen in the future. What approach would meet this requirement?

  A. Remove Order delete Permission from Profiles and Permission Sets
  B. Implement a Sharing Rule that changes access for order to Read.
  C. Remove the Delete button from the Order Page Layout.
  D. Change the Record Type/Page Layout assignment for orders to be Read Only.
  A. Remove Order delete Permission from Profiles and Permission Sets
  D. Change the Record Type/Page Layout assignment for orders to be Read Only.

• Question 135:

  Universal containers (UC) implemented a private organization-wide default for the Container and Case objects.

  How can UC give support representatives access to Container and Case records owned by Customer Community users?

  A. Create an ownership-based sharing rule that gives access to the head of support role and internal subordinates
  B. Create a criteria-based sharing rule that gives access to the head of support role and internal subordinates
  C. Support representatives nil automatically get access to these records via the role hierarchy
  D. Create a Share Group based on the sharing set created for the Customer Community User Profile.
  D. Create a Share Group based on the sharing set created for the Customer Community User Profile.

• Question 136:

  Which two access grants are stored in the Group Maintenance tables? Choose 2 answers

  A. Inherited access grants
  B. Explicit grants
  C. Group Membership grants
  D. Implicit grants
  A. Inherited access grants
  C. Group Membership grants

• Question 137:

  Universal Containers has developed an AppExchange managed package for their distribution partners, which required a private key to be generated for each partner and used by the code. Universal Containers support representatives must be able to access the private key value to debug connection issues, but it must not be possible for the partner to access the value.

  How can the Architect best support this requirement?

  A. Store the value in a text field on a protected custom setting in the package.
  B. Store the value in a static variable in a class included in the managed package.
  C. Store the value in the text field on a list custom setting in the managed package.
  D. Store the value in an encrypted field on a custom object in the package.
  C. Store the value in the text field on a list custom setting in the managed package.

• Question 138:

  The Finance team at Universal Containers usually does not need access to Account and Contract records A .. given Opportunity access for a big deal to help with tax calculation. She can now also access Account and C.. Which two reasons could be causing this issue? Choose 2 answers

  A. Contact records can be accessed due to implicit sharing from Account.
  B. Account records can be accessed due to implicit sharing from Opportunity.
  C. Contact records can be accessed due to implicit sharing from Opportunity.
  D. Account records can be access due to role hierarchy.
  A. Contact records can be accessed due to implicit sharing from Account.
  B. Account records can be accessed due to implicit sharing from Opportunity.

• Question 139:

  Universal Containers, a global corporation of 50,000 users, has a 24x7 call center operated by 20,000 users that includes employees and contractors. Their sales organization is 10,000 strong and they started processing about 100,000 updates to opportunity custom fields called Priority and NextStep. They also started processing 20,000 updates to a highly nested territory hierarchy. There was a third mass update on a Next Step field on the Action Plan custom object that has Case as a lookup field. Users started seeing a Group membership lock error in the system. What is a probable cause for this error?

  A. Lock contention on Account records because of Opportunity object updates.
  B. Lock contention due to system-initiated sharing rule recalculation
  C. Lock contention on Case records because of Action Plan custom object updates.
  D. Lock contention on Territory object because of Territory object updates.
  B. Lock contention due to system-initiated sharing rule recalculation

• Question 140:

  Universal Containers (UC) has recently changed its internal policy to follow market regulations and create an internal team to manage the collection process. Only this team should have access to Invoke records. currently, invoke is a child in

  a Master-Detail relationship to Account. Although related lists have been removed from the page layouts, some profiles stills have access to the invoice object.

  Which approach should an architect recommend to fix this problem?

  A. Create a new Profile with no access to the Invoice object and assign it to all unauthorized users.
  B. Create a Permission Set with No Access to the Invoice object and assign it to unauthorized users.
  C. Replace Account and Invoke Master Detail Relationship by a Lookup and remove Invoice Access from the unauthorized profiles,
  D. Change the Invoke organization-wide default from Controlled by Parent to Private and remove invoke access from the unauthorized
  C. Replace Account and Invoke Master Detail Relationship by a Lookup and remove Invoice Access from the unauthorized profiles,