Nutanix NCA-6.10 Online Practice Questions and Exam Preparation

Nutanix NCA-6.10 Online Questions & Answers

• Question 1:

  After logging into Prism Element, an administrator sees a red heart as shown in the exhibit.

  

  Which dashboard will help the administrator isolate the cause of the issue?

  A. Health
  B. Tasks
  C. Alerts
  D. Analysis
  C. Alerts

  ---

  Explanation

  Alerts is the appropriate focus because.

  The Alerts dashboard is the place to isolate the active condition behind a red health indicator and review what is currently firing. Alerts maps the scenario to planned maintenance safety, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Alerts keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Alerts should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Health points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Alerts helps isolate the actual administrative function. Tasks can matter in a different workflow, while Alerts is tied to the outcome requested here.

  Analysis is a neighboring term, but Alerts carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Alerts is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 2:

  Nutanix Support has asked an administrator to provide an NCC output, but there is no access to the command line.

  What should the administrator do to provide the requested NCC output?

  A. Run Health Checks in the Alert Dashboard and enter an email to send it to.
  B. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard.
  C. Run Health Checks in the Event Dashboard.
  D. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Alert Dashboard.
  B. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard.

  ---

  Explanation

  Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard is the appropriate focus because Configuring email and running health checks from the Health dashboard lets an administrator provide NCC output without command-line access. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard maps the scenario to alert policy control, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Run Health Checks in the Alert Dashboard and enter an email to send it to points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard helps isolate the actual administrative function. Run Health Checks in the Event Dashboard can matter in a different workflow, while Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard is tied to the outcome requested here. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Alert Dashboard is a neighboring term, but Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Configure email in Alert Settings and Run Health Checks in the Health Dashboard is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 3:

  A team wants to reduce physical storage usage for suitable workloads without changing the logical size presented to virtual machines.

  Which category of feature should the team evaluate?

  A. Storage optimization
  B. Support case management
  C. Hypervisor registration
  D. Event acknowledgement
  A. Storage optimization

  ---

  Explanation

  Storage optimization is the appropriate focus because Storage optimization features reduce physical storage consumption while keeping the logical storage presentation unchanged for workloads. Storage optimization maps the scenario to software inventory handling, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Storage optimization keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Storage optimization should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Support case management should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Storage optimization. Hypervisor registration points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Storage optimization helps isolate the actual administrative function. Event acknowledgement can matter in a different workflow, while Storage optimization is tied to the outcome requested here. Storage optimization is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 4:

  Which storage container option reduces the available storage to other containers?

  A. Advertised Capacity
  B. Erasure Coding
  C. Capacity Deduplication
  D. Reserved Capacity
  D. Reserved Capacity

  ---

  Explanation

  Reserved Capacity is the appropriate focus because Reserved capacity carves out a committed amount of storage for one container, so that capacity is no longer freely available for other containers. Reserved Capacity maps the scenario to planned maintenance safety, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Reserved Capacity keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Reserved Capacity should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Advertised Capacity points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Reserved Capacity helps isolate the actual administrative function. Erasure Coding can matter in a different workflow, while Reserved Capacity is tied to the outcome requested here. Capacity Deduplication is a neighboring term, but Reserved Capacity carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Reserved Capacity is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 5:

  When using the LCM Dark Site procedure in Prism Element or Prism Central, which Nutanix software component should be checked and upgraded first?

  A. MSP
  B. Foundation
  C. NCC
  D. LCM Framework
  D. LCM Framework

  ---

  Explanation

  LCM Framework is the appropriate focus because.

  The LCM Framework should be upgraded first because it is the engine that coordinates the remaining LCM dark-site inventory and update workflow. LCM Framework maps the scenario to support ticket workflow, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. LCM Framework keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. LCM Framework should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  MSP points to a separate concern, so comparing it with LCM Framework helps isolate the actual administrative function. Foundation can matter in a different workflow, while LCM Framework is tied to the outcome requested here. NCC is a neighboring term, but LCM Framework carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. LCM Framework is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 6:

  An administrator wants to apply tags to licenses to simplify future renewals.

  What interface would be used to complete this operation?

  A. Clusters in the Support Portal
  B. License Inventory in the Support Portal
  C. Prism Central Licensing
  D. Prism Element Licensing
  C. Prism Central Licensing

  ---

  Explanation

  Prism Central Licensing is the appropriate focus because Prism Central Licensing is the interface used to assign and organize licensing details such as renewal-related tags. Prism Central Licensing maps the scenario to site recovery planning, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Prism Central Licensing keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved.

  Prism Central Licensing should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Clusters in the Support Portal is a neighboring term, but Prism Central Licensing carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. License Inventory in the Support Portal should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Prism Central Licensing. Prism Element Licensing points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Prism Central Licensing helps isolate the actual administrative function. Prism Central Licensing is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 7:

  An administrator is considering a data protection strategy between two sites. There is a 10ms round trip latency between the two clusters.

  Which data protection solution can the administrator implement that minimizes data loss in the event of a disaster?

  A. NearSync Replication
  B. Metro Availability
  C. Async DR
  D. Synchronous Replication
  A. NearSync Replication

  ---

  Explanation

  NearSync Replication is the appropriate focus because NearSync Replication minimizes data loss for a ten millisecond round-trip latency profile where asynchronous protection would have a larger recovery point.

  NearSync Replication maps the scenario to cluster support evidence, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. NearSync Replication keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. NearSync Replication should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Metro Availability should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to NearSync Replication. Async DR points to a separate concern, so comparing it with NearSync Replication helps isolate the actual administrative function. Synchronous Replication can matter in a different workflow, while NearSync Replication is tied to the outcome requested here. NearSync Replication is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 8:

  What role does a Replication Factor of 2 or 3 play in ensuring data integrity and recovery?

  A. It limits the scope of hardware failures during recovery operations.
  B. It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery.
  C. It accelerates data transfer to remote backup sites.
  D. It reduces the need for offsite backup solutions.
  B. It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery.

  ---

  Explanation

  It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery is the appropriate focus because Replication factor protects integrity by keeping multiple copies of data available for recovery after a component failure. It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery maps the scenario to health dashboard interpretation, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  It limits the scope of hardware failures during recovery operations is a neighboring term, but It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. It accelerates data transfer to remote backup sites should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery. It reduces the need for offsite backup solutions points to a separate concern, so comparing it with It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery helps isolate the actual administrative function. It ensures that multiple copies of data are available for recovery is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 9:

  An administrator is reviewing a Nutanix cluster and needs to understand whether the current licensing supports the intended operational features.

  Where should the administrator focus?

  A. The cluster license level
  B. The guest operating system version
  C. The VM power state list
  D. The event retention interval
  A. The cluster license level

  ---

  Explanation

  The cluster license level is the appropriate focus because.

  The cluster license level determines whether the intended operational features are entitled and available. The cluster license level maps the scenario to storage resiliency design, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. The cluster license level keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. The cluster license level should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  The guest operating system version can matter in a different workflow, while.

  The cluster license level is tied to the outcome requested here. The VM power state list is a neighboring term, but The cluster license level carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. The event retention interval should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to The cluster license level. The cluster license level is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 10:

  An administrator is looking to upgrade their licensing on a Nutanix cluster.

  Which licensing levels are available for a Nutanix cluster?

  A. Community Edition, Pro, Enterprise
  B. Starter, Pro, Dedicated
  C. Starter, Pro, Ultimate
  D. Mixed, Advanced, Enterprise
  C. Starter, Pro, Ultimate

  ---

  Explanation

  Starter, Pro, Ultimate is the appropriate focus because Starter, Pro, and Ultimate are the cluster license levels used to describe Nutanix feature entitlement. Starter, Pro, Ultimate maps the scenario to cluster support evidence, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Starter, Pro, Ultimate keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Starter, Pro, Ultimate should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Community Edition, Pro, Enterprise should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Starter, Pro, Ultimate. Starter, Pro, Dedicated points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Starter, Pro, Ultimate helps isolate the actual administrative function. Mixed, Advanced, Enterprise can matter in a different workflow, while Starter, Pro, Ultimate is tied to the outcome requested here. Starter, Pro, Ultimate is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.