Nutanix NCA-6.10 Online Practice Questions and Exam Preparation

Nutanix NCA-6.10 Online Questions & Answers

• Question 31:

  Refer to the exhibit.

  

  What should be first selected to run a full health check?

  A. Scheduled
  B. Actions
  C. Checks
  D. Failed
  B. Actions

  ---

  Explanation

  Actions is the appropriate focus because.

  The Actions menu is the control used to launch operations from the health check page, including a full health check run. Actions maps the scenario to virtual networking design, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Actions keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Actions should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Scheduled can matter in a different workflow, while Actions is tied to the outcome requested here. Checks is a neighboring term, but Actions carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Failed should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Actions. Actions is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 32:

  What priority case can be opened to guarantee a 8-hour response for a customer with Production Support?

  A. P1
  B. P2
  C. P3
  D. P4
  A. P1

  ---

  Explanation

  P1 is the appropriate focus because A P1 case is the priority level associated with the strongest response commitment under the support plan. P1 maps the scenario to entitlement management, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. P1 keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. P1 should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  P2 can matter in a different workflow, while P1 is tied to the outcome requested here. P3 is a neighboring term, but P1 carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. P4 should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to P1. P1 is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 33:

  An administrator needs to implement a disaster recovery plan. The company has two sites, each with its own Nutanix AHV cluster. Latency between the sites is 30ms.

  Which built-in functionality in Prism Element could the administrator use to enable disaster recovery between the two clusters?

  A. Recovery Plan
  B. Protection Policies
  C. Data Protection
  D. Metro Cluster
  D. Metro Cluster

  ---

  Explanation

  Metro Cluster is the appropriate focus because Metro Cluster is the built-in synchronous disaster recovery style that links two sites for rapid recovery when the latency profile is acceptable. Metro Cluster maps the scenario to storage resiliency design, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Metro Cluster keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved.

  Metro Cluster should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Recovery Plan can matter in a different workflow, while Metro Cluster is tied to the outcome requested here. Protection Policies is a neighboring term, but Metro Cluster carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Data Protection should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Metro Cluster. Metro Cluster is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 34:

  An administrator wants to create a storage container for an application that has built-in redundancy.

  What should the administrator do?

  A. Enable RF1 and create an RF1 storage container.
  B. Create an RF1 storage container.
  C. Create an RF1 storage container and enable RF1.
  D. RF1 is enabled by default in a storage container.
  B. Create an RF1 storage container.

  ---

  Explanation

  Create an RF1 storage container is the appropriate focus because Creating an RF1 storage container is the relevant action when the application already supplies its own redundancy and the platform should not create extra copies. Create an RF1 storage container maps the scenario to support ticket workflow, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Create an RF1 storage container keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Create an RF1 storage container should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Enable RF1 and create an RF1 storage container points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Create an RF1 storage container helps isolate the actual administrative function. Create an RF1 storage container and enable RF1 can matter in a different workflow, while Create an RF1 storage container is tied to the outcome requested here. RF1 is enabled by default in a storage container is a neighboring term, but Create an RF1 storage container carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Create an RF1 storage container is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 35:

  An administrator needs to decide whether a cluster is ready for a planned update and wants to review the current condition of the environment first.

  Which action should the administrator perform?

  A. Change the cluster license level
  B. Run a cluster health check
  C. Create a new storage container
  D. Modify the replication factor
  B. Run a cluster health check

  ---

  Explanation

  Run a cluster health check is the appropriate focus because A cluster health check is the right readiness review before a planned update because it examines current conditions and known issues. Run a cluster health check maps the scenario to site recovery planning, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Run a cluster health check keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Run a cluster health check should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Change the cluster license level is a neighboring term, but Run a cluster health check carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Create a new storage container should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Run a cluster health check. Modify the replication factor points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Run a cluster health check helps isolate the actual administrative function. Run a cluster health check is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 36:

  What is true when adding a storage-only node to the cluster?

  A. Nutanix Files must be deployed.
  B. Nutanix Objects must be deployed.
  C. It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster.
  D. It can have a different hypervisor than the other nodes in the cluster.
  C. It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster.

  ---

  Explanation

  It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster is the appropriate focus because Storage-only nodes must align with the cluster hypervisor expectation because they join the same cluster architecture and operational lifecycle. It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster maps the scenario to virtual networking design, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Nutanix Files must be deployed can matter in a different workflow, while It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster is tied to the outcome requested here. Nutanix Objects must be deployed is a neighboring term, but It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. It can have a different hypervisor than the other nodes in the cluster should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster. It must have the same hypervisor as the other nodes in the cluster is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 37:

  An administrator has spent time correcting specific issues that have been identified by NCC Health Checks in Prism Element.

  How can just the checks that previously did not pass be executed again to confirm they are all resolved?

  A. Run LCM Pre-Upgrade to trigger NCC Checks.
  B. Run ncc health checks run_all.
  C. Select Run Check for each check worked.
  D. Select Only Failed And Warning Checks.
  D. Select Only Failed And Warning Checks.

  ---

  Explanation

  Select Only Failed And Warning Checks is the appropriate focus because Only Failed And Warning Checks reruns the checks that previously reported problems, allowing a focused confirmation pass after remediation. Select Only Failed And Warning Checks maps the scenario to software inventory handling, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Select Only Failed And Warning Checks keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Select Only Failed And Warning Checks should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Run LCM Pre-Upgrade to trigger NCC Checks should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Select Only Failed And Warning Checks. Run ncc health checks run_all points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Select Only Failed And Warning Checks helps isolate the actual administrative function. Select Run Check for each check worked can matter in a different workflow, while Select Only Failed And Warning Checks is tied to the outcome requested here. Select Only Failed And Warning Checks is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 38:

  An administrator is building a new Windows VM on a Nutanix AHV cluster. However, when the administrator tries to install the OS, no disks are listed as available.

  What does the administrator need to do to resolve the issue?

  A. Add a second disk to the VM.
  B. Enable Turbo Mode on the VM.
  C. Mount and install the VirtIO drivers.
  D. Mount and install the Nutanix Guest Tools.
  C. Mount and install the VirtIO drivers.

  ---

  Explanation

  Mount and install the VirtIO drivers is the appropriate focus because.

  The Windows installer needs VirtIO drivers for AHV storage devices before the virtual disks are visible during operating system installation.

  Mount and install the VirtIO drivers maps the scenario to health dashboard interpretation, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Mount and install the VirtIO drivers keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Mount and install the VirtIO drivers should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Add a second disk to the VM is a neighboring term, but Mount and install the VirtIO drivers carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Enable Turbo Mode on the VM should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Mount and install the VirtIO drivers. Mount and install the Nutanix Guest Tools points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Mount and install the VirtIO drivers helps isolate the actual administrative function. Mount and install the VirtIO drivers is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 39:

  An administrator needs to remove several old VM snapshots.

  From which Prism Element dashboard should the administrator complete this task?

  A. Tasks
  B. Settings
  C. VM
  D. Storage
  C. VM

  ---

  Explanation

  VM is the appropriate focus because.

  The VM dashboard is where administrators manage virtual-machine snapshots and remove old ones. VM maps the scenario to logical storage behavior, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. VM keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. VM should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Tasks is a neighboring term, but VM carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Settings should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to VM. Storage points to a separate concern, so comparing it with VM helps isolate the actual administrative function. VM is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 40:

  An administrator is using LCM at a connected site to update various components on a Nutanix cluster and notices that the LCM Framework is not updated to the current version.

  What step should the administrator take to ensure LCM is updated to the latest release?

  A. Upgrade AOS
  B. Restart genesis across the cluster.
  C. Perform an inventory.
  D. Run an NCC health check.
  C. Perform an inventory.

  ---

  Explanation

  Perform an inventory is the appropriate focus because Performing an inventory refresh lets LCM discover the current framework and component versions before applying updates. Perform an inventory maps the scenario to site recovery planning, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Perform an inventory keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved.

  Perform an inventory should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Upgrade AOS is a neighboring term, but Perform an inventory carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. Restart genesis across the cluster should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Perform an inventory. Run an NCC health check points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Perform an inventory helps isolate the actual administrative function. Perform an inventory is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.