Nutanix NCA-6.10 Online Practice Questions and Exam Preparation

Nutanix NCA-6.10 Online Questions & Answers

• Question 71:

  An administrator needs to ensure that the three VMs of an application cluster are never placed onto the same hypervisor by creating a VM-VM Anti-Affinity Policy.

  What should the administrator use to complete this task?

  A. Prism Central
  B. acli
  C. Prism Element
  D. Ncli
  A. Prism Central

  ---

  Explanation

  Prism Central is the appropriate focus because VM-VM anti-affinity is a placement policy, and Prism Central is the management plane where those policies are created and applied across managed clusters.

  Prism Central maps the scenario to entitlement management, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Prism Central keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Prism Central should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  acli can matter in a different workflow, while Prism Central is tied to the outcome requested here. Prism Element is a neighboring term, but Prism Central carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement.

  Ncli should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Prism Central. Prism Central is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 72:

  Which Nutanix Disaster Recovery component or feature provides the best Recovery Time Objective (RTO)?

  A. Async
  B. Availability Zone
  C. Metro Availability
  D. NearSync
  C. Metro Availability

  ---

  Explanation

  Metro Availability is the appropriate focus because Metro Availability provides the strongest recovery time objective among the listed Nutanix protection modes because it keeps sites closely synchronized. Metro Availability maps the scenario to health dashboard interpretation, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Metro Availability keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Metro Availability should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Async is a neighboring term, but Metro Availability carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement.

  Availability Zone should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Metro Availability.

  NearSync points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Metro Availability helps isolate the actual administrative function. Metro Availability is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 73:

  An administrator is documenting the main purpose of Nutanix storage components for new operations staff.

  Which statement best describes a storage container?

  A. It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads.
  B. It is a physical disk group that must contain only boot devices.
  C. It is an alerting object used to suppress repeated events.
  D. It is a licensing object used to activate cluster features.
  A. It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads.

  ---

  Explanation

  It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads is the appropriate focus because A storage container is a logical storage construct used to present storage resources to workloads. It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads maps the scenario to support ticket workflow, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  It is a physical disk group that must contain only boot devices points to a separate concern, so comparing it with It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads helps isolate the actual administrative function. It is an alerting object used to suppress repeated events can matter in a different workflow, while It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads is tied to the outcome requested here. It is a licensing object used to activate cluster features is a neighboring term, but It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. It is a logical storage construct used to present storage to workloads is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 74:

  Which workload type would be a good fit for NFS on Objects?

  A. End user computing workloads
  B. Filesystems used for transitory or work spaces
  C. Large-scale, read heavy workloads
  D. Workloads that are updated frequently
  C. Large-scale, read heavy workloads

  ---

  Explanation

  Large-scale, read heavy workloads is the appropriate focus because NFS on Objects is suited to large-scale, read-heavy access where object-backed capacity and NFS presentation are useful together. Large-scale, read heavy workloads maps the scenario to entitlement management, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Large-scale, read heavy workloads keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Large-scale, read heavy workloads should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  End user computing workloads can matter in a different workflow, while Large-scale, read heavy workloads is tied to the outcome requested here. Filesystems used for transitory or work spaces is a neighboring term, but Large-scale, read heavy workloads carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement.

  Workloads that are updated frequently should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Large-scale, read heavy workloads. Large-scale, read heavy workloads is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 75:

  What is the benefit of configuring user-defined Alert Policies in Prism Central?

  A. It customizes alert thresholds.
  B. It restricts network access for administrators.
  C. It automates VM migrations.
  D. It reduces the frequency of system updates.
  A. It customizes alert thresholds.

  ---

  Explanation

  It customizes alert thresholds is the appropriate focus because User-defined alert policies let administrators tune thresholds and conditions so alerts match operational requirements. It customizes alert thresholds maps the scenario to logical storage behavior, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. It customizes alert thresholds keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. It customizes alert thresholds should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  It restricts network access for administrators is a neighboring term, but It customizes alert thresholds carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. It automates VM migrations should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to It customizes alert thresholds. It reduces the frequency of system updates points to a separate concern, so comparing it with It customizes alert thresholds helps isolate the actual administrative function. It customizes alert thresholds is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 76:

  When multiple Alert policies are applied to an entity, which will take precedence?

  A. Policy are applied to a specific entity type.
  B. Policy are applied to all entities of an entity type.
  C. Policy are applied to an entity type in a category.
  D. Policy are applied to an entity type in a cluster.
  A. Policy are applied to a specific entity type.

  ---

  Explanation

  Policy are applied to a specific entity type is the appropriate focus because Policies applied to a specific entity type take precedence because that scope is evaluated before broader all-entity or category-wide policies. Policy are applied to a specific entity type maps the scenario to virtual machine operations, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Policy are applied to a specific entity type keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Policy are applied to a specific entity type should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Policy are applied to all entities of an entity type should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Policy are applied to a specific entity type. Policy are applied to an entity type in a category points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Policy are applied to a specific entity type helps isolate the actual administrative function. Policy are applied to an entity type in a cluster can matter in a different workflow, while Policy are applied to a specific entity type is tied to the outcome requested here. Policy are applied to a specific entity type is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 77:

  Which two items are cluster-level administration concerns? Choose two.

  A. Determining the cluster license level
  B. Reviewing cluster-level settings
  C. Configuring a local user inside a guest operating system
  D. Changing an application-specific timeout value
  E. Updating a workstation browser preference
  A. Determining the cluster license level
  B. Reviewing cluster-level settings

  ---

  Explanation

  Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings is the appropriate focus because Determining the cluster license level and reviewing cluster-level settings are both cluster-scope administrative duties rather than guest or user preference work. Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings maps the scenario to logical storage behavior, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  Configuring a local user inside a guest operating system is a neighboring term, but Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement.

  Changing an application-specific timeout value should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings. Updating a workstation browser preference points to a separate concern, so comparing it with Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings helps isolate the actual administrative function.

  Determining the cluster license level and Reviewing cluster-level settings is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 78:

  What is the default admin session log out time?

  A. 5 minutes
  B. 10 minutes
  C. 15 minutes
  D. 20 minutes
  C. 15 minutes

  ---

  Explanation

  15 minutes is the appropriate focus because.

  The default administrator session timeout is fifteen minutes, which limits idle administrative sessions without being so short that normal work is interrupted. 15 minutes maps the scenario to health dashboard interpretation, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. 15 minutes keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. 15 minutes should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  5 minutes is a neighboring term, but 15 minutes carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. 10 minutes should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to 15 minutes. 20 minutes points to a separate concern, so comparing it with 15 minutes helps isolate the actual administrative function. 15 minutes is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 79:

  When configuring a physical network switch in Prism Element, what information is required?

  A. DNS Configuration
  B. NTP Configuration
  C. SMTP Configuration
  D. SNMP Configuration
  D. SNMP Configuration

  ---

  Explanation

  SNMP Configuration is the appropriate focus because Physical switch integration in Prism Element relies on SNMP details so the cluster can discover and monitor switch information. SNMP Configuration maps the scenario to site recovery planning, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. SNMP Configuration keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved.

  SNMP Configuration should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  DNS Configuration is a neighboring term, but SNMP Configuration carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. NTP Configuration should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to SNMP Configuration. SMTP Configuration points to a separate concern, so comparing it with SNMP Configuration helps isolate the actual administrative function. SNMP Configuration is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.

• Question 80:

  Which storage protocol is supported for a datastore when using ESXi as the hypervisor within a Nutanix cluster?

  A. iSCSI
  B. SMB
  C. LVM
  D. NFS
  D. NFS

  ---

  Explanation

  NFS is the appropriate focus because ESXi hosts in a Nutanix cluster consume datastore storage from the distributed fabric through NFS rather than SMB or local volume formats. NFS maps the scenario to storage resiliency design, which is the boundary that determines where the administrator should act in a Nutanix environment. NFS keeps the operation in a supported path with predictable cluster behavior when multiple nodes, services, workloads, or management views are involved. NFS should be remembered as a functional match: identify the requested outcome, then choose the Nutanix component that owns that outcome.

  iSCSI can matter in a different workflow, while NFS is tied to the outcome requested here. SMB is a neighboring term, but NFS carries the responsibility that satisfies the requirement. LVM should be ruled out because the behavior under discussion belongs to NFS. NFS is also a useful study anchor because it links the scenario wording to a real administrative action instead of to a term that only shares the same general topic.