Exam Details

  • Exam Code
    :PR2P
  • Exam Name
    :Exin PRINCE2 Practitioner (PR2P)
  • Certification
    :Exin Certification
  • Vendor
    :EXIN
  • Total Questions
    :190 Q&As
  • Last Updated
    :May 03, 2025

EXIN Exin Certification PR2P Questions & Answers

  • Question 141:

    Which of the following represents the four key characteristics a good Project board should display?

    A. Authority, Credibility, Commitment, Availability

    B. Authority, Credibility, Delegation, Availability

    C. Authority, Availability, Connections, Delegation

    D. Authority, Credibility, Connections, Delegation

  • Question 142:

    In which Management product would the Project Board specify where the authority for change requests lies?

    A. Risk Management Strategy

    B. Quality Management Strategy

    C. Communication Strategy

    D. Configuration Management Strategy

  • Question 143:

    Who is responsible for ensuring that Communication Management Strategy is appropriate and that planned communication activities actually take place?

    A. Project Assurance

    B. Project Manager

    C. Corporate or Programme Management

    D. Project Support

  • Question 144:

    Which of the following roles cannot be combined?

    A. Executive and Senior User

    B. Project Manager and Project Support

    C. Project Assurance and Team Manager

    D. Senior Suppler and Supplier Assurance

  • Question 145:

    Which of the following is False?

    A Successful project management team should.

    A. Have business, user and supplier stakeholder representation

    B. Never be reviewed as members should stay with the team for the duration

    C. Ensure appropriate governance by defining responsibilities for directing, managing and delivering the project and clearly defining accountability at all levels

    D. Have an effective strategy to manage communication flows to and from stakeholders

  • Question 146:

    Which of the following statements is true of the business interest on the project?

    A. Ensures the project provides value for money

    B. Ensures the requirements for the project are defined

    C. Ensures the products produced meet the desired quality

    D. Represents the users of the product

  • Question 147:

    Scenario

    A central government department, the Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH), faces increasing pressure to cut costs, better manage suppliers' performance and reduce the confusion caused by inadequate internal controls, outdated standards and

    outdated technology. External consultants were employed to conduct a feasibility study to identify options to address the problems, and the likely costs and benefits. The following options were considered:

    Do nothing.

    Re-engineer selected business functions.

    Outsource selected business functions.

    The feasibility study concluded that there was a case for outsourcing the MFH Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division (maintenance of buildings and grounds). The recommendations were:

    One service provider should be contracted to provide the services currently provided by the Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division. A 10-year service contract should be agreed with the selected service provider.

    The feasibility study developed high-level designs of the current organization, processes, systems and operating models, plus an outline Business Case for the required project. The external consultants also made the following

    recommendations for the management of the project:

    Use PRINCE2.

    Set up the project with 4 management stages:

    Stage 1. Standard PRINCE2 initiation activities.

    Stage 2. Create detailed designs (future organization, processes, systems and operating models) and the service level agreement between MFH and the future service provider.

    Stage 3. Request and evaluate proposals, select service provider and agree contract.

    Stage 4. Transfer equipment and staff, transfer responsibility for service provision and run trial period.

    Initial estimates indicated that the project would cost £2.5m and take two years to complete. MFH senior management agreed that there was a case for outsourcing, and accepted the recommendations as a basis for the project. There is an expected saving of £20m over 10 years.

    The Outsourcing project has completed the Starting up a Project process and is now in the initiation stage. Because of the strategic importance of the project, the MFH Chief Executive Officer has taken the role of Executive. A PRINCE2experienced Project Manager has been appointed from within MFH. Staff within the business functions being outsourced will work with the external consultants who conducted the feasibility study to define the detailed designs.

    Which 2 statements should be recorded under the Major risks heading?

    A. Due to market conditions a suitable service provider may not be found, possibly leading to premature closure of the project.

    B. Owing to employment contract changes staff may resist outsourcing, which would make it difficult to transfer staff to the selected service provider.

    C. MFH's operations may be reduced and the 1a-year contract may not achieve its estimated value of ?0m, which would reduce the service provider's profit.

    D. The initial estimates, taken from the feasibility study report, indicate that the project will take two years to complete, which means that the business problems would remain for this period.

    E. The management stages recommended by the consultants may not be appropriate, resulting in confusion in planning.

  • Question 148:

    Scenario

    A central government department, the Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH), faces increasing pressure to cut costs, better manage suppliers' performance and reduce the confusion caused by inadequate internal controls, outdated standards and

    outdated technology. External consultants were employed to conduct a feasibility study to identify options to address the problems, and the likely costs and benefits. The following options were considered:

    Do nothing.

    Re-engineer selected business functions.

    Outsource selected business functions.

    The feasibility study concluded that there was a case for outsourcing the MFH Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division (maintenance of buildings and grounds). The recommendations were:

    One service provider should be contracted to provide the services currently provided by the Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division.

    A 10-year service contract should be agreed with the selected service provider.

    The feasibility study developed high-level designs of the current organization, processes, systems and operating models, plus an outline Business Case for the required project. The external consultants also made the following

    recommendations for the management of the project:

    Use PRINCE2.

    Set up the project with 4 management stages:

    Stage 1. Standard PRINCE2 initiation activities.

    Stage 2. Create detailed designs (future organization, processes, systems and operating models) and the service level agreement between MFH and the future service provider.

    Stage 3. Request and evaluate proposals, select service provider and agree contract.

    Stage 4. Transfer equipment and staff, transfer responsibility for service provision and run trial period.

    Initial estimates indicated that the project would cost £2.5m and take two years to complete. MFH senior management agreed that there was a case for outsourcing, and accepted the recommendations as a basis for the project. There is an

    expected saving of £20m over 10 years.

    The Outsourcing project has completed the Starting up a Project process and is now in the initiation stage. Because of the strategic importance of the project, the MFH Chief Executive Officer has taken the role of Executive. A PRINCE2experienced Project Manager has been appointed from within MFH. Staff within the business functions being outsourced will work with the external consultants who conducted the feasibility study to define the detailed designs.

    Which 2 statements should be recorded under the Timescale heading?

    A. The contract with the selected service provider will be agreed during stage 3.

    B. The expected benefits will be calculated over 10 years from completion of the project.

    C. If more MFH divisions are added to the scope of the services to be outsourced, the project timescale will be extended and the realization of benefits will be delayed.

    D. The expected benefits should start to be realized as soon as the outsourced services become operational at the end of stage 4.

    E. The transfer of equipment and staff is estimated to take six weeks.

  • Question 149:

    Scenario

    A central government department, the Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH), faces increasing pressure to cut costs, better manage suppliers' performance and reduce the confusion caused by inadequate internal controls, outdated standards and

    outdated technology. External consultants were employed to conduct a feasibility study to identify options to address the problems, and the likely costs and benefits. The following options were considered:

    Do nothing.

    Re-engineer selected business functions.

    Outsource selected business functions.

    The feasibility study concluded that there was a case for outsourcing the MFH Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division (maintenance of buildings and grounds). The recommendations were:

    One service provider should be contracted to provide the services currently provided by the Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division.

    A 10-year service contract should be agreed with the selected service provider.

    The feasibility study developed high-level designs of the current organization, processes, systems and operating models, plus an outline Business Case for the required project. The external consultants also made the following

    recommendations for the management of the project:

    Use PRINCE2.

    Set up the project with 4 management stages:

    Stage 1. Standard PRINCE2 initiation activities.

    Stage 2. Create detailed designs (future organization, processes, systems and operating models) and the service level agreement between MFH and the future service provider.

    Stage 3. Request and evaluate proposals, select service provider and agree contract.

    Stage 4. Transfer equipment and staff, transfer responsibility for service provision and run trial period.

    Initial estimates indicated that the project would cost £2.5m and take two years to complete. MFH senior management agreed that there was a case for outsourcing, and accepted the recommendations as a basis for the project. There is an

    expected saving of £20m over 10 years.

    The Outsourcing project has completed the Starting up a Project process and is now in the initiation stage. Because of the strategic importance of the project, the MFH Chief Executive Officer has taken the role of Executive. A PRINCE2experienced Project Manager has been appointed from within MFH. Staff within the business functions being outsourced will work with the external consultants who conducted the feasibility study to define the detailed designs.

    Which 2 statements should be recorded under the Expected dis-benefits heading?

    A. An investment of ?.5m is required.

    B. Staff morale will be negatively affected.

    C. The project will take two years to deliver.

    D. Staff may lose the opportunity to work in Information Technology.

    E. MFH will lose direct control over the outsourced business functions.

  • Question 150:

    Scenario

    A central government department, the Ministry of Food Hygiene (MFH), faces increasing pressure to cut costs, better manage suppliers' performance and reduce the confusion caused by inadequate internal controls, outdated standards and

    outdated technology. External consultants were employed to conduct a feasibility study to identify options to address the problems, and the likely costs and benefits. The following options were considered:

    Do nothing.

    Re-engineer selected business functions.

    Outsource selected business functions.

    The feasibility study concluded that there was a case for outsourcing the MFH Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division (maintenance of buildings and grounds). The recommendations were:

    One service provider should be contracted to provide the services currently provided by the Information Technology Division and the Facilities Division.

    A 10-year service contract should be agreed with the selected service provider.

    The feasibility study developed high-level designs of the current organization, processes, systems and operating models, plus an outline Business Case for the required project. The external consultants also made the following

    recommendations for the management of the project:

    Use PRINCE2.

    Set up the project with 4 management stages:

    Stage 1. Standard PRINCE2 initiation activities.

    Stage 2. Create detailed designs (future organization, processes, systems and operating models) and the service level agreement between MFH and the future service provider.

    Stage 3. Request and evaluate proposals, select service provider and agree contract.

    Stage 4. Transfer equipment and staff, transfer responsibility for service provision and run trial period.

    Initial estimates indicated that the project would cost £2.5m and take two years to complete. MFH senior management agreed that there was a case for outsourcing, and accepted the recommendations as a basis for the project. There is an expected saving of £20m over 10 years.

    The Outsourcing project has completed the Starting up a Project process and is now in the initiation stage. Because of the strategic importance of the project, the MFH Chief Executive Officer has taken the role of Executive. A PRINCE2experienced Project Manager has been appointed from within MFH. Staff within the business functions being outsourced will work with the external consultants who conducted the feasibility study to define the detailed designs.

    Which 2 statements should be recorded under the Expected benefits heading?

    A. The 10-year outsourcing contract, at current prices, will be worth ?0m.

    B. Outsourcing would allow MFH to take advantage of the best services the outsourcing industry has to offer.

    C. The total expected savings over 10 years, at current prices, is ?0m.

    D. The 10-year outsourcing contract will enable MFH to stabilize costs at agreed levels.

    E. The confirmed cost of the Outsourcing project is ?.5m, but with considerable savings over 10 years.

Tips on How to Prepare for the Exams

Nowadays, the certification exams become more and more important and required by more and more enterprises when applying for a job. But how to prepare for the exam effectively? How to prepare for the exam in a short time with less efforts? How to get a ideal result and how to find the most reliable resources? Here on Vcedump.com, you will find all the answers. Vcedump.com provide not only EXIN exam questions, answers and explanations but also complete assistance on your exam preparation and certification application. If you are confused on your PR2P exam preparations and EXIN certification application, do not hesitate to visit our Vcedump.com to find your solutions here.