APEGS APEGS-NPPE Online Practice Questions and Exam Preparation

APEGS APEGS-NPPE Online Questions & Answers

• Question 61:

  Two patties have discussed the feasibility of executing a highway project, and a study has proven that It will be profitable and beneficial to the public. A contract has been entered into between the two parties for execution of the work. A disagreement emerges at this point/ with no sign of resolution In sight. One party suggests arbitration as a way to resolve the Issue. However, the second party rejects t on the basis that arbitration is not addressed in the contract and therefore cannot be used as a resolution tool.

  Which of the following statements explains whether the second party is correct?

  A. Yes, because arbitration should be Included as a mandatory clause in the contract.
  B. Yes, because a contract clause should call for mandatory arbitration at one party's discretion, at the very least.
  C. No, because whether both parties agree or not, even without a mandatory clause in the contract, arbitration can be sought.
  D. No, because If a contract clause calls for mandatory arbitration at one party's discretion, the other party has to also agree to the process.
  C. No, because whether both parties agree or not, even without a mandatory clause in the contract, arbitration can be sought.

  ---

  Explanation

  The second party is incorrect to reject arbitration simply because it is not addressed in the contract (Option C). Arbitration can still be sought if both parties agree to it, even in the absence of a pre-existing mandatory arbitration clause in the contract. Arbitration is a common form of alternative dispute resolution that can be agreed upon by parties at any time if both find it mutually beneficial, thereby avoiding more costly and time-consuming litigation.

• Question 62:

  According to most professional associations' codes of ethics. licensed professionals are required to take all of the following actions except

  A. keeping themselves informed in order to maintain their competence
  B. striving to advance the body of knowledge within which they practice
  C. providing opportunities for the professional development of their subordinates
  D. keeping a Journal and record of what they have learned for reporting personal development
  D. keeping a Journal and record of what they have learned for reporting personal development

  ---

  Explanation

  According to most professional associations' codes of ethics, licensed professionals are indeed expected to maintain their competence, advance their field, and support the professional development of their subordinates. However, there is no standard requirement for professionals to keep a journal and record of what they have learned for the purpose of reporting personal development. While personal development and ongoing learning are encouraged, the specific act of maintaining a learning journal is not a typically mandated ethical requirement across professional associations.

• Question 63:

  A senior licensed professional engineer was hired by a municipality to be an expert witness in a lawsuit brought by the municipality against a local engineering Arm for flaws in their structural design of the newly opened city hall. During the course of Investigating the facts, the senior engineer discovers a serious structural design flaw that could be dangerous to the public if corrective action is not token immediately. The two parties decide to settle out of court, and as port of the settlement, the parties enter into a confidentiality agreement and the engineering firm rectifies oil structural flows to the municipality's satisfaction. The municipality that hired the senior engineer requests that the senior engineer keep aII facts learned during the investigation confidential.

  To whom does the engineer owe a duty and what. If any, action should the engineer take?

  A. The engineer owes a duly to the client only; the engineer should keep all facts confidential.
  B. The engineer owes a duty to the client and to the profession; the engineer should keep all facts found during the investigation confidential due to the confidentiality agreement.
  C. The engineer owes a duty to the public, the client, and the profession; the engineer should keep all facts found during the Investigation confidential due to the confidentiality agreement.
  D. The engineer owes a duty to the public, the client, and the profession; the engineer should disclose all facts found during the investigation despite the confidentiality agreement as the public could have been at risk.
  D. The engineer owes a duty to the public, the client, and the profession; the engineer should disclose all facts found during the investigation despite the confidentiality agreement as the public could have been at risk.

  ---

  Explanation

  The engineer in this scenario owes a duty to the public, the client, and the profession. The discovery of a serious structural flaw that could be dangerous to the public necessitates that the engineer must prioritize the safety of the public over confidentiality agreements, especially when the public's safety is at risk. This aligns with the professional obligation of engineers to hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public as outlined in the general principles of engineering ethics and professional conduct codes, such as those by Engineers Canada. Therefore, despite the confidentiality agreement, the engineer should disclose all facts found during the investigation.

• Question 64:

  Louts, a licensed professional member, was asked by his employer to reduce the stages of a process for expediency and in order to reduce costs. Louis advised his employer that this was not an industry test practice. However, the employer Insisted that Louis make the requested adjustment, which presented Louis with a dilemma.

  Which of the following approaches is best for Louis to take in this situation?

  A. Ignore the employer in line with Louie' commitment to ethical practice
  B. Research appropriate guidelines permitting such adjustment
  C. Go ahead with the adjustment using his best Judgement
  D. Report his employer to the professional association
  B. Research appropriate guidelines permitting such adjustment

  ---

  Explanation

  The best approach for Louis in this situation is to research appropriate guidelines permitting such an adjustment (Option B). This action allows Louis to explore whether there are any industry standards or exceptions that might justify the changes requested by his employer. It is crucial for a professional to uphold ethical standards and ensure that any modifications to processes do not compromise safety, quality, or violate industry best practices. By researching relevant guidelines, Louis can make an informed decision and provide documented evidence to support his final action, whether to proceed with or reject the adjustments.

• Question 65:

  Mediation, one of the methods of alternate dispute resolution (ADR), Is an assisted negotiation process In which a neutral third party facilitates settlement between the parties. Which of the following statements related to the mediation process Is true?

  A. A mediator Is always appointed by a judge of the provincial or higher courts in Canada.
  B. Mediations cannot be used for complex multi-party disputes because of current laws in Canada.
  C. The representative of each party in a mediation must have the authority to conclude a settlement.
  D. The mediator of any dispute may or may not enjoy the trust of either one, both, or all of the parties.
  C. The representative of each party in a mediation must have the authority to conclude a settlement.

  ---

  Explanation

  The representative of each party in a mediation must have the authority to conclude a settlement. This is essential for the mediation process to be effective, as the mediator facilitates negotiations with the goal of reaching a settlement that all parties can agree to. If the representatives do not have the necessary authority to agree to a settlement, the process can become futile, wasting time and resources without achieving a resolution.

• Question 66:

  In a contract, a force majeure clause is a clause that

  A. contains threats or coercion that may be used to induce a party to enter into a contract
  B. Is particularly biased towards one party and may be evidence of an inequality in bargaining power
  C. Is a misleading or deceptive statement made by one party to Induce the other party to enter into the contract
  D. provides relief or contractual obligations due to future events that the parties agree make the contract impossible to execute and are beyond their control
  D. provides relief or contractual obligations due to future events that the parties agree make the contract impossible to execute and are beyond their control

  ---

  Explanation

  A force majeure clause in a contract (Option D) provides relief from contractual obligations due to future events that are beyond the control of the parties and make the contract impossible to execute. This clause is standard in contracts to protect all parties involved from circumstances such as natural disasters, war, or other "acts of God" that prevent one or all parties from fulfilling their contractual duties. It is not about coercion, bias, or misleading statements but about managing risk in unforeseen scenarios.

• Question 67:

  All of the following duties are duties of professional engineers and geoscientists to society except the duty to ensure that their work will.

  A. promote the health and safety of the public
  B. achieve maximum benefits for society at large
  C. achieve maximum returns on Investment for their employer
  D. promote the protection of the environment through socially acceptable means
  C. achieve maximum returns on Investment for their employer

  ---

  Explanation

  Among the listed duties of professional engineers and geoscientists to society, the duty to achieve maximum returns on investment for their employer (Option C) is least aligned with their societal obligations. The primary duties of professionals in these fields towards society include promoting public health and safety, environmental protection, and benefiting society at large. The focus on financial returns pertains more to organizational or business objectives rather than societal duties.

• Question 68:

  For more than 10 years, a licensed professional has been a key employee at DLB Ltd., a small engineering firm that specializes in rotary drill pit technology for the oil and gas sector. Over the years, the professional leads the development of Innovative drill bit designs that significantly Improve DLB Ltd.'s profitability. Though the work is stimulating, the professional feels overworked, under-appreciated, and underpaid. Recently, the professional is actively courted by Gyre Ltd, an engineering company specializing in tunnel-boring technology m the urban transportation industry.

  Which of the following actions least conflicts with the professional's responsibilities and loyalties to DLB Ltd?

  A. Communicating with colleagues that DLB Ltd. is poorly managed and an abysmal place to work
  B. Duplicating their own personal client list collected over time at DLB Ltd. In order to maintain future customer contacts
  C. Sharing designs with Gyre Ltd. contacts Including detailed drill bit configurations specific to models personally generated while at DLB Ltd.
  D. Discussing with Gyre Ltd. recruiters key technical drivers controlling drill bit efficiencies based on knowledge gained through personal experience at DLB Ltd.
  D. Discussing with Gyre Ltd. recruiters key technical drivers controlling drill bit efficiencies based on knowledge gained through personal experience at DLB Ltd.

  ---

  Explanation

  Discussing technical details based on general knowledge gained through personal experience does not conflict with the professional's responsibilities and loyalties to DLB Ltd. While the professional should avoid sharing proprietary or confidential information from DLB Ltd., discussing broad technical concepts that drive efficiencies, which are part of the professional's general expertise, does not typically violate confidentiality or loyalty obligations .

• Question 69:

  Jaspreet Is a licensed professional member who belongs to a science education society. She edits a Journal paper for her society. Can Jaspreet use this activity to obtain Professional Development Units (POUs) or Continuing Education Units (CEUs) to maintain her professional registration?

  A. Yes. editing journal papers generally qualifies for PDU or CEU credits
  B. No, not usually unless the paper is written in mora than one language
  C. No, editing Journal papers generally does not qualify for PDU or CEU credits
  D. Yes, but only if the paper is as long as the length stipulated by her association
  A. Yes. editing journal papers generally qualifies for PDU or CEU credits

  ---

  Explanation

  The answer is A. Editing journal papers can generally qualify for Professional Development Units (PDUs) or Continuing Education Units (CEUs), which are necessary for maintaining professional registration. This type of activity is recognized because it contributes to the professional's knowledge and skills, especially in staying current with industry standards and developments. Most professional associations consider activities that enhance or update the professional's knowledge and professional skills as eligible for PDUs or CEUs.

• Question 70:

  Which of the following is a valid example of vicarious liability?

  A. An employer held responsible for an employee's professional error
  B. A contractor blaming a supplier for cost overruns
  C. A regulator suing an engineer for negligence
  D. A client refusing payment for delay
  A. An employer held responsible for an employee's professional error

  ---

  Explanation

  Vicarious liability holds employers legally responsible for employees' negligent acts committed within the scope of employment.