Free LSAT-TEST Web TestEngine Demo

Q73 Single choice

David: Forbidding companies from hiring permanent replacements for striking employees would be profoundly unfair. Such companies would have little leverage in their negotiations with strikers. Lin: No, the companies would still have sufficient leverage in negotiations if they hired temporary replacements.

Which one of the following statements is most strongly supported by the exchange between David and Lin?

A
David does not believe that the freedom to hire temporary replacements gives companies any leverage in their negotiations with strikers.
B
David and Lin believe that companies should be allowed as much leverage in negotiations as the striking employees.
C
David and Lin disagree over the amount of leverage companies lose in their negotiations with strikers by not being able to hire permanent replacements.
D
David and Lin disagree over how much leverage should be accorded companies in their negotiations with strikers.
E
Lin believes it is unfair to forbid companies from hiring permanent replacements for their striking employees.

LSAT-TEST Web TestEngine demo