ACAMS CAMS Online Practice Questions and Exam Preparation

ACAMS CAMS Online Questions & Answers

• Question 331:

  Which two statements in the Wolfsberg Group's "Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism" define the role financial institutions should play in the fight against terrorism? (Choose two.)

  A. Financial institutions need to assist competent authorities in fighting terrorist financing through prevention, detection and information sharing.
  B. Financial institutions need to continuously analyze the types of activity related to terrorist financing and develop models that in the long term will drive down terrorism.
  C. Financial institutions should have financial intelligence units dedicated to the investigation of activity that would lead to the detection of terrorist financing as a means to decrease global terrorism.
  D. Financial institutions should apply extra due diligence whenever they see suspicious or irregular activities, especially when customers are engaged in sectors or activities that have been identified by competent authorities as being used for the financing of terrorism.
  A. Financial institutions need to assist competent authorities in fighting terrorist financing through prevention, detection and information sharing.
  D. Financial institutions should apply extra due diligence whenever they see suspicious or irregular activities, especially when customers are engaged in sectors or activities that have been identified by competent authorities as being used for the financing of terrorism.

  ---

  The correct answer is A and D, as these two statements are directly quoted from the Wolfsberg Group's "Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism" document1. Statement A describes the general role of financial institutions in the fight against terrorism, while statement D describes the specific due diligence measures that financial institutions should apply to customers engaged in high-risk sectors or activities. Statement B and C are not part of the Wolfsberg Group's document, and they are not accurate descriptions of the role of financial institutions in the fight against terrorism. Statement B is too vague and unrealistic, as financial institutions cannot guarantee to drive down terrorism by analyzing activity types. Statement C is too narrow and prescriptive, as financial institutions may not have the resources or the mandate to create dedicated financial intelligence units for terrorist financing. References: 1: The Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism ?Wolfsberg Statement, page 213-214. Reference: https://www.wolfsberg-principles.com/sites/default/files/wb/pdfs/The-Wolfsberg-Group.pdf

• Question 332:

  The bank for International Settlements provides the secretariat for which organization?

  A. The Basel Committee
  B. FATF
  C. The Wolfsberg Group
  D. The Egmont Group
  A. The Basel Committee

  ---

  http://www.bis.org/bcbs/about.htm (4th para) Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (Basel Committee) The Basel Committee was established by the G- 10's central bank of governors in 1974 to promote sound supervisory standards worldwide. Its secretariat is appointed by the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland.

• Question 333:

  What are the main components of a FATF mutual evaluation?

  A. Measuring effectiveness and technical compliance
  B. Assessing a country and training
  C. Scoping and on-site visits
  D. Drafting reports and plenary discussions
  A. Measuring effectiveness and technical compliance

• Question 334:

  A profitable commercial customer who operates an import-export business has multiple accounts with the same institution at branches m different locations. The customer receives funds from a jurisdiction perceived as highly corrupt according to Transparency International ratings. The customer makes frequent transfers among the accounts and prefers to manage the accounts separately. What should the institution do to mitigate the risk associated with these accounts?

  A. File a suspicious transaction report
  B. Diminish the importance of the subjective Transparency International rating
  C. Conduct a trade-price manipulation analysis
  D. Develop a system to monitor all the activity
  D. Develop a system to monitor all the activity

  ---

  According to the Anti-Money Laundering Specialist (the 6th edition) resources, the institution should develop a system to monitor all the activity of the customer's accounts to mitigate the risk associated with these accounts. This is because the customer's behavior and profile may indicate some red flags of money laundering, such as: Operating an import-export business, which is a common sector for trade-based money laundering, where trade transactions are used to disguise the movement of illicit funds, either by over- or under- invoicing, misrepresenting the quantity or quality of goods, or falsifying documents. Receiving funds from a jurisdiction perceived as highly corrupt, which may increase the risk of the funds being derived from bribery, embezzlement, fraud, or other predicate offences2. Transparency International is a global civil society organization that publishes an annual Corruption Perceptions Index, which ranks countries by their perceived levels of public sector corruption based on expert assessments and surveys. Making frequent transfers among the accounts, which may indicate a layering technique, where funds are moved through multiple accounts, institutions, or jurisdictions to obscure the audit trail and the source and ownership of the funds. Preferring to manage the accounts separately, which may indicate a lack of transparency or an attempt to avoid detection or reporting by the institution. By developing a system to monitor all the activity of the customer's accounts, the institution can: Identify and verify the identity and beneficial ownership of the customer and the parties involved in the transactions. Obtain and verify information on the nature and purpose of the business relationship and the source and destination of the funds. Conduct a risk assessment of the customer and the transactions based on the customer's profile, behavior, and geographic locations. Apply enhanced due diligence and ongoing monitoring measures for higher-risk customers and transactions, such as obtaining additional information, documentation, or approval, or conducting more frequent or in-depth reviews. Detect and report any suspicious or unusual transactions or activities to the relevant authorities. The other three options are incorrect because: File a suspicious transaction report is not the best answer, as it is a reactive measure that should be taken after the institution has identified or suspected money laundering or terrorist financing activity, not before. The institution should first conduct due diligence and monitoring of the customer and the transactions, and then file a report if there are reasonable grounds to believe that the activity is suspicious or unusual. Diminish the importance of the subjective Transparency International rating is not the best answer, as it is a complacent and irresponsible attitude that may expose the institution to legal, regulatory, reputational, or operational risks. The Transparency International rating is not subjective, but based on credible sources and methodologies, and it is widely used as a reference by governments, businesses, civil society, and the public to assess the level of corruption in different countries3. The institution should not ignore or downplay the rating, but rather use it as one of the factors to evaluate the risk of the customer and the transactions. Conduct a trade-price manipulation analysis is not the best answer, as it is a specific and technical measure that may not be sufficient or appropriate to mitigate the risk associated with these accounts. A trade-price manipulation analysis is a method of detecting trade-based money laundering by comparing the prices of goods or services in a transaction with the market prices or other benchmarks, and identifying any significant discrepancies or anomalies. However, this measure may not be feasible or effective if the institution does not have access to reliable and comparable data, or if the goods or services are not standardized or homogeneous. Moreover, this measure may not address other aspects of the risk, such as the identity, ownership, or behavior of the customer and the parties involved in the transactions.

• Question 335:

  When should new business products to evaluated for AML concerns?

  A. After they have been implemented so there is empirical data to review
  B. Before they are launched into the market
  C. At the time of the next enterprise risk assessment
  D. On an annual basis
  B. Before they are launched into the market

  ---

  New business products should be evaluated for AML concerns before they are launched into the market. This is because new products may introduce new risks or vulnerabilities that could be exploited by money launderers or terrorist financiers. By conducting a pre-launch assessment, a financial institution can identify and mitigate these risks, design appropriate controls and procedures, and ensure compliance with the relevant laws and regulations. A pre-launch assessment can also help a financial institution to align its AML strategy with its business objectives, and avoid potential reputational damage or regulatory sanctions.

• Question 336:

  Which statements relate to the mandate, roles, and responsibilities of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and the FATF-Style Regional Bodies (FSRBs)? (Select Two).

  A. In the process of setting standards. FATF will only consider inputs from its member countries as part of the consultation process.
  B. FSRBs have the right to develop standards with which their member countries are bound to comply.
  C. FSRBs play an essential role in identifying and addressing AML technical assistance needs for their individual member countries.
  D. FATF and FSRBs are free-standing organizations that share the common goals of combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation.
  E. FATF member countries cannot be members of an FSRB at the same time.
  C. FSRBs play an essential role in identifying and addressing AML technical assistance needs for their individual member countries.
  D. FATF and FSRBs are free-standing organizations that share the common goals of combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation.

  ---

  C. FSRBs play an essential role in identifying and addressing AML technical assistance needs for their individual member countries. The FSRBs are responsible for promoting the effective implementation of the FATF Recommendations at the regional level, including by assisting member countries in identifying technical assistance needs and facilitating the provision of such assistance. D. FATF and FSRBs are free-standing organizations that share the common goals of combating money laundering and the financing of terrorism and proliferation. The FATF is an intergovernmental body that sets global standards for AML/ CFT and promotes their effective implementation, while the FSRBs are regional organizations that work to promote the effective implementation of the FATF Recommendations at the regional level.

• Question 337:

  As emphasized in the Basel Committee guidance for "Sound Management of Risks Related to Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism" , the third line of defense (audit function) should:

  A. Conduct AML audits no less often than every 12 months for consistency in annual reporting.
  B. Report to the audit committee of the board of directors to maintain independence.
  C. Remain independent from expressing opinions on the sufficiency of remediation or action plans to address findings and recommendations.
  D. Be involved in the day-to-day operations of the AML program to immediately prevent control failures.
  B. Report to the audit committee of the board of directors to maintain independence.

  ---

  The third line of defense (internal audit) provides independent oversight of an institution's AML/CFT compliance framework . Option B (Correct): The internal audit function should report to the board's audit committee to maintain independence and objectivity . Option A (Incorrect): While frequent audits are essential, AML audits should be risk-based rather than mandated at a strict 12-month interval. Option C (Incorrect): Internal audit must assess remediation plans to ensure they adequately address AML deficiencies . Option D (Incorrect): The third line of defense should not be involved in daily AML operations to avoid conflicts of interest . Three Lines of Defense in AML Risk Management: A screenshot of a computer Description automatically generated Best Practices for AML Audit Function: Ensure complete independence from AML operations. Conduct risk-based audits tailored to emerging threats. Report audit findings to the board for effective oversight.

• Question 338:

  Money laundering has social and economic impacts, especially within developing countries. A high volume of money laundering in a country may: (Select Two.)

  A. Reduce confidence in the country's financial sector.
  B. Dissuade government tax incentive programs.
  C. Lower the employment rate.
  D. Dissuade foreign investment.
  E. Reduce volatility in exchange and interest rates.
  A. Reduce confidence in the country's financial sector.
  D. Dissuade foreign investment.

  ---

  Money laundering negatively affects economic stability by discouraging investment, distorting markets, and eroding public trust. Option A (Correct): A financial system tainted by money laundering loses credibility, leading to reduced investor and consumer confidence. Option D (Correct): Foreign investors avoid jurisdictions with weak AML controls due to the risk of sanctions and reputational damage. Option B (Incorrect): While tax evasion is linked to money laundering, it does not directly affect the decision to implement tax incentives. Option C (Incorrect): Unemployment may result from economic instability, but money laundering does not directly cause job losses. Option E (Incorrect): Money laundering often increases volatility in financial markets, not reduces it.

• Question 339:

  When performing a risk assessment, which factors should be considered when identifying and measuring risk? (Choose two.)

  A. Customer composition
  B. Financial performance
  C. Product offerings
  D. Regulatory environment
  E. Company culture
  A. Customer composition
  C. Product offerings

  ---

  Customer composition and product offerings are two important factors that affect the level of risk exposure for a financial institution (FI) in terms of money laundering and terrorist financing. Customer composition refers to the types of customers that the FI serves, such as individuals, businesses, non-profit organizations, or politically exposed persons (PEPs). Different customer segments may pose different levels of risk depending on their activities, sources of funds, geographic locations, and connections to other entities. For example, customers that are cash-intensive, have complex ownership structures, operate in high-risk jurisdictions, or are associated with PEPs may present higher risk indicators than customers that are transparent, regulated, and operate in low-risk jurisdictions12. Product offerings refer to the types of products, services, and transactions that the FI provides, such as deposits, loans, wire transfers, trade finance, or digital assets. Different products, services, and transactions may have different levels of vulnerability to money laundering and terrorist financing depending on their features, complexity, volume, and speed. For example, products that are anonymous, involve high-value or cross-border transfers, enable rapid movement of funds, or involve new or emerging technologies may present higher risk indicators than products that are identifiable, involve low- value or domestic transfers, require multiple verification steps, or involve established or traditional technologies12. References: 1: Risk Assessment: Risk Factors and Mitigating Measures2 2: Risk Assessment: Process, Examples, and Tools1

• Question 340:

  A director of a financial institution was convicted of laundering money as part of a Ponzi scheme and terminated. As a result of an internal investigation evidence proved that an employee assisted in the illegal activity. Which action should the institution take?

  A. Discipline the employee with no further action
  B. Discipline the employee and inform local authorities
  C. Since the employee was not charged, no further action is required
  D. Require all employees to complete additional anti-money laundering training
  B. Discipline the employee and inform local authorities

  ---

  If an employee of a financial institution is found to have assisted in money laundering or any other criminal activity, the institution should take appropriate disciplinary action and report the employee to the relevant authorities. This is not only a legal obligation, but also a sound compliance practice to protect the institution's reputation and integrity. Disciplining the employee without informing the authorities would be insufficient and potentially expose the institution to further legal risks. Ignoring the employee's involvement or requiring additional training for all employees would be ineffective and inappropriate responses. References: ACAMS CAMS Certification Package - 6th Edition, Chapter 5: Compliance Standards for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), pp. 121-1221 ACAMS CAMS Certification Package - 6th Edition, Chapter 6: AML Compliance Program, pp. 143 ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course, Module 5: Compliance Standards for Anti- Money Laundering (AML) and Combating the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), Lesson 5.2: International Standards and Best Practices2 ACAMS CAMS Certification Video Training Course, Module 6: AML Compliance Program, Lesson 6.4: Internal Controls2